Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Teimuraz Gabashvili vs Lukas Rosol Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gabashvili vs Rosol analysis and find out who is favored!
Teimuraz Gabashvili vs Lukas Rosol Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gabashvili 4 - 5 Rosol
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gabashvili has won 46.41% of points on their second serve, while Rosol has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gabashvili, in recent form, has won 52.15% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rosol has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.27% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gabashvili has saved 48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rosol has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gabashvili has won 72.97% of matches played (W/L 27/ 10), with Rosol winning 47.06% (W/L 8/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gabashvili has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 291/ 242), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 12/ 19). Rosol has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 329/ 240), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 25/ 29).
- Player level: In the last year, Gabashvili has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.97% of matches (W/L 27/ 10), where as Rosol has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 7/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 9 times before with Gabashvili winning 4 times and Rosol being victorious 5 times. They have played 23 sets in total, with Gabashvili winning 12 and Rosol winning 11. The last match between Gabashvili and Rosol was at the Irving Challenger, 14-03-2017, Q3, Hard with Lukas Rosol getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:51:37.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gabashvili and Rosol have played a deciding set 4 times, with Gabashvili winning 1 times and Rosol 3 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 4 tiebreaks against each other with Gabashvili winning 2, and Rosol 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gabashvili has played against opponents with an average rank of 41.84 while Rosol has played against players with an average rank of 277.94.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gabashvili has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rosol has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gabashvili has converted 42.31% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rosol has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
881
Rank
43
High
39
Age
R
Plays
4
Total5
0
Hard2
4
Clay2
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
873
Rank
26
High
38
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
53% (662-592)
Career Total W/L
55% (666-544)
80% (8-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,636,260
Career Prize Money
$1,884,780
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Teimuraz Gabashvili vs Lukas Rosol For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gabashvili VS Rosol
Sportsbook
Offer
Gabashvili VS Rosol H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Teimuraz Gabashvili | Lukas Rosol |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 4 | 5 |
| Sets Won | 12 | 11 |
| Games Won | 109 | 116 |
| Aces (Total) | 27 | 34 |
| DFs (Total) | 19 | 20 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:51:37 | 0:51:37 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (269/477) | 57% (285/503) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (181/269) | 71% (202/285) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (110/208) | 49% (106/218) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (17/43) | 36% (19/53) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (195/503) | 39% (186/477) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (3/8) | 63% (5/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 25% (1/4) | 75% (3/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 60% (5/3) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 40% (5/2) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 40% (5/2) |
Gabashvili VS Rosol H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 3-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Lukas Rosol
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
6
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
6
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
31%
(
13 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
42 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
| 3-6 6-3 7-6(7) |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
52%
(
62 of
119)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
54%
(
31 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
38%
(
45 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
96)
107
Total Points Won
108
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Lukas Rosol
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
8
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
27%
(
23 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
95
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 6-1 |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Lukas Rosol
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 6-0 |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
86)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| 1-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | |||||
| 7-6(4) 6-1 | |||||
| 7-5 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Teimuraz Gabashvili | Lukas Rosol |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 80% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 70% (16/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 60% (129/87) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 80% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 22 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.42 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 45 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:30 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (263/500) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (181/263) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (110/237) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (33/78) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (252/532) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 80% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 80% (8/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Teimuraz Gabashvili Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maxim Mrva
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
46%
(
29 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Markus Molder
50%
(
34 of
68)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Matteo Meneghetti
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
27%
(
7 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
51%
(
29 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Kanan Gasimov
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Luca Wiedenmann
52%
(
45 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
9
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
1
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Zekai Li
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 4-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Vishal Saravanan
43%
(
19 of
44)
1st Serve %
76%
(
25 of
33)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
2
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Lukas Rosol Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Player
Lukas Rosol
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve %
58%
(
19 of
33)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
38
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Tommaso Compagnucci
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edoardo Lavagno
Player
Lukas Rosol
56%
(
56 of
100)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
112)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
102
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Lukas Rosol
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
55%
(
45 of
82)
8
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Mirza Basic
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
9
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Lukas Rosol
52%
(
54 of
104)
1st Serve %
53%
(
69 of
129)
5
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
11
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
38%
(
19 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
46 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
60 of
129)
118
Total Points Won
115
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Patrik Homola
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Lukas Rosol
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Lukas Rosol
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
83)
14
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Alan Bojarski
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Gabashvili Vs Rosol Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gabashvili are available here and Rosol photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
